This is a MuniPro demonstration of a redesigned Texas Bond Review Board website. It is not the official BRB site: nothing filed here reaches BRB, and the email addresses shown are BRB's own.

The official site is brb.texas.gov.

Participant

Baxter & Woodman Inc

Paid on 3 local government issues in BRB's local issuance fee table, $134,750 in fees reported.

By role

Baxter & Woodman Inc: issues, par, fees and sale types by role, every loaded fiscal year
Role?Issues?Par of those issues?Fees paid?Median cost per $1,000?Negotiated?Competitive?Private placement?First FY?Last FY?Paid by the underwriter?
RoleEngineers, accountants and other consultantsIssues3Par of those issues$7,970,000Fees paid$134,750Median cost per $1,000$16.96Negotiated0Competitive3Private placement0First FY2024Last FY2024Paid by the underwriter$0

Issues

3 issues, newest first.

Skip the issues baxter & woodman inc worked on table
Issues Baxter & Woodman Inc worked on, sorted by closed, descending. Select a column heading to sort by it.
Issue?Issuer?Closed?FY?Role?Sale type?Par?Fees to this firm?Per $1,000 of par?
Defined Area Unl Tax Park Bonds Ser 2024Fort Bend County MUD 1306/20/20242024Engineers, accountants and other consultantsCompetitive$2,400,000$41,000$17.08
WW & SS Sys Comb Unl Tax & Rev Bonds Ser 2024Montgomery County UD 24/23/20242024Engineers, accountants and other consultantsCompetitive$2,550,000$43,250$16.96
Unl Tax Bonds Ser 2023Forest Hills MUD12/14/20232024Engineers, accountants and other consultantsCompetitive$3,020,000$50,500$16.72
Total, all 3$134,750

Rows 1–3 of 3

Fees are as BRB's table reports them for each issue. The underwriter's spread counts once, and median and per-$1,000 figures use the issuer's one-time costs only: rows paid by the underwriter are shown in the fees but not added to them (how the participant tables are made).

EMMA links are added as each issue is matched.

Source: Local Issuance Fee By Year (updated by the publisher 10/6/2026). Loaded here 10/9/2026.

Texas fiscal years run September 1 to August 31.

Issuer names are shown as published, without source footnote letters.

Figures are as reported to the agency and have not been independently verified.